When it comes to post-oil spill clean up, Mother Nature can take care of herself.
Surface oil will evaporate, rise into the atmosphere, and get broken down by sunlight. Billions of microbes will eat heavy oil that has been tossed around through wind and wave action. Communities of microorganisms work in concert to convert the oil into carbon dioxide and water. These microbes are able to do so because they have certain oil-degrading enzymes. [3] What are the most important microorganisms? Well that depends on the composition of the crude oil that is present in the environment; different microorganisms prefer different carbon sources.
Crude oil is made of four main components: saturated hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, resins, and, asphaltenes; the latter two are more polar than the hydrocarbons. [3] Saturated hydrocarbons make up the largest proportion of crude oil, making their degradation an extremely important part of the removal of crude oil from the environment. [9] The following bacteria are known to use hydrocarbons exclusively as their carbon source:
Because resins and asphaltenes are more toxic and persistent due to their polarity, they are of greater long-term environment importance. [3] However, it is not known which microbes can effectively remove resins and asphaltenes, which is why dispersants and solvents are typically used.
There are several things that can work against oil-eating bacteria, but in an "ideal" situation, the oil would be light and well dispersed over a large area, it would be composed primarily of hydrocarbons, there would be plenty of nitrogen, phosphate, and oxygen available to the bacteria, the water would be warm and have a relatively low pressure, the salinity and pH of the water would be stable, and there would be a diverse selection of microbes all working together to degrade the oil. [3] These conditions would allow for the quickest oil-degradation, but of course, it is unlikely that all of these conditions will be met at the same time. [9]
Crude oil is made of four main components: saturated hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, resins, and, asphaltenes; the latter two are more polar than the hydrocarbons. [3] Saturated hydrocarbons make up the largest proportion of crude oil, making their degradation an extremely important part of the removal of crude oil from the environment. [9] The following bacteria are known to use hydrocarbons exclusively as their carbon source:
- Alcanivorax spp.
- Cycloclasticus spp.
- Oleiphilus spp.
- Oleispira spp.
- Thalassolituus spp.
Because resins and asphaltenes are more toxic and persistent due to their polarity, they are of greater long-term environment importance. [3] However, it is not known which microbes can effectively remove resins and asphaltenes, which is why dispersants and solvents are typically used.
There are several things that can work against oil-eating bacteria, but in an "ideal" situation, the oil would be light and well dispersed over a large area, it would be composed primarily of hydrocarbons, there would be plenty of nitrogen, phosphate, and oxygen available to the bacteria, the water would be warm and have a relatively low pressure, the salinity and pH of the water would be stable, and there would be a diverse selection of microbes all working together to degrade the oil. [3] These conditions would allow for the quickest oil-degradation, but of course, it is unlikely that all of these conditions will be met at the same time. [9]
3 comments:
Very clear title, I had an idea of what the page was about as soon as I read the title. Clear text so what you're talking about is very obvious. There doesn't seem to be anything missing on this page, its very concise, which is likely a good thing, but some explanation of the process of oil break down might be useful for the readers.
I think that some more explanation of the graphic would be helpful on this page, also there was another unloaded image at the top of the page. Not sure if it's just my computer but I haven't been having this issue with any other sites.
Interesting stuff going on here. It makes me wonder if there have been any studies of sites that got major human cleanup vs sites that didn't, to compare how fast the oil was degraded at both sites.
Post a Comment